i don't think a single person who put time, money, and effort into their projects would want to let basicly anyone have access to them. i have seen people who mooch off of project rejects, mass breed, and then sell them way underpriced, so the original creator gets no credit for the design, gets no profit from making it in the first place. do you think anyone would ever want to make a project then? it would ruin them.

if we still keep the option of releasing, then eh..maybe. but i bet it would probably just be flooded by unappealing dishwaters no one wants anyways.

also, i really dont get why a lot of players (newer players mostly) who see releasing as such a evil thing. i think it's much better for a pet to be running free in the wild than being trapped with the players who have no money, hoard tons of pets they can't care for, and leave them in endless starvation.

*goes around feeding and buying pets*


Although a shelter OPTION would be good....but y'know, with limits.

I mean, I have a free redwood griffi I do not need at all (terrible traits, sheesh really?) and i'm willing to let go fo anything. Same for most of the pets in my sale stab. Except the bottom row-that's overflow.

newer players hate it because nice pets are lost forever, and to fix the no credit problem there could be a icon that is placed on pets to say where they came from that sticks for 4 generations. To fix the mass breed thing there should be a item or trait that makes a limited number of breeds possible, this would be passed on for 4 generations.
you would keep release

also plain pets are useful for projects

what did you exepect both parent where plain and no traits could be carried on

seems like a lot of complicated stuff for crediting original creators. breeding cooldown is in place and i don't think limiting it more would help that much. personally i'm good with the release system as it is now.


also i don't get what your trying to say here?

Link: https://www.sylestia.com/forums/?thread=75227&page=2#14 Author: Rottiegirl Time Posted: 4/8/2019 at 11:28 PM what did you exepect both parent where plain and no traits could be carried on

so you went against what you said earlier about them being useful. plain pets are not useful to projects. if they have no traits to pass on, they cause the project to take longer and move backward.

not what i ment


for example


and
could make

no i do not get it ether

when i said plain i ment things like this



the meaning of the word varies depending on what you want

i forgot to tell you
if you give a pet in a good roleplay, where emotion takes over, the person will never want to let them go ever.
I'v seen it happen.(i caused it ;)

nex time can you just edit ONE post instead of pinging me 3 different times? or just not pinging in those other 2 posts? it gets really annoying when its repeated.

first ping: that isnt plain. plain means zero traits. when both have 1v of the same, offsprings will have that 1v. projects are the same but on a higher level: multiple same traits, same colors.

second ping: id say that pet is more cluttered/messy than plain. dishwater colors are what make him look plain-ish

third ping: I suppose thats a personal thing. but for most players its not that big of an issue

oh, i thought of plain as very few traits with light or dark colors

and i don't think that was the nicest looking one either

true, but if someone goes for it you learn a lot about that person
(just talking about things you agree or disagree on teaches you something new about
them, which is good to know.)



also what happened to your starter pet, and have you played this game befor