it would increass the odds but not directly, it remove the chance of the male's trait getting in the genetic ( no H? or ?? possible) so you have an increassed odd of getting II from this angle. ^-^

I think what Scath was getting at was that having II on the male does not increase the odds of having I visible in the offspring of the example given.

Female: HI
Male: II

Female gives H 50% of the time and gives I 50% of the time
Male gives I 100% of the time
result: 50% HI 50 II
Therefore I is visible 50% of the time

Female: HI
Male: IK

Female gives H 50% of the time and gives I 50% of the time
Male gives I 50% of the time and gives K 50% of the time
Result: HI 25% II 25% HK 25% IK 25%
Therefore I is visible 50% of the time


Female: HI
Male: MO


Female gives H 50% of the time and gives I 50% of the time
Male gives M 50% of the time and gives O 50% of the time
Result: HM 25% IM 25% HO 25% IO 25%
Therefore I is visible 50% of the time

Having II on the male is only important if you're worried about getting an II result, not if you just want I to be expressed visibly.